Workers Compensation and ICD-10

While healthcare providers and physicians may be scrambling to get ready for ICD-10, workers’ compensation practitioners are not required to switch to the new codes, according to the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange (WEDI), an advisor to the Department of Health and Human Services.

Approximately one-half of the Workers compensation claims systems are ready to switch to ICD-10 on October 1. About one-half, or 26 states will continue to use ICD-9 codes after Oct. 1 2015. Therefore your PM system will have to support switching between ICD-9 and ICD-10. Plus you staff has to be well-trained to avoid any confusion.

[Also: ICD-10 checklist: AHA releases step-by-step preparation guide]

WEDI has released data on worker’s compensation readiness by state. Twenty-one states have adopted ICD-10 billing for physicians, hospital inpatients and outpatients, according to WEDI.

ICD-10 ready: Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas and Washington.

Three states have adopted ICD-10 codes for hospital inpatient billing only: Indiana, Maine and South Carolina.

[Also: With ICD-10 about a month away, healthcare providers say ‘bring it on’]

Continue with ICD-9: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

If you hear anything different please email me at ecf@eyecodingforum.com and we will update this post.